TY - JOUR
T1 - Climate change in master of healthcare administration curriculum
T2 - an untapped opportunity
AU - Hertelendy, Attila
AU - Mitchell, Cheryl
AU - Durneva, Polina
AU - Banaszak-Holl, Jane
AU - Dadich, Ann
AU - Porter, Tracy
AU - Gutberg, Jennifer
AU - Richmond, John
AU - McNulty, Eric
AU - Zang, Ying
AU - Singer, Sara
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - Extreme weather events fueled by climate change are intensifying. Our study found a paucity of accredited graduate healthcare or health service administration programs in the United States, Canada, and Australia that teach climate change and healthcare administration. We used a mixed-methods approach that included a website audit and program director interviews. Our website audit found that only three (.02%) of 156 accredited programs mentioned climate change in their programs or course descriptions. Course content focused on the societal impacts of climate change but did not address the leadership or managerial implications of how to mitigate and manage through climate crises. Interviews clarified factors that shaped course content, with five themes constructed–namely, curriculum integration and accreditation influence; student-driven curriculum evolution; faculty interest and an interdisciplinary approach; competency knowledge and integration; and the influence of sociopolitical contexts. Based on these findings, accredited programs would benefit from the integration of climate change and healthcare administration education. To be successful, students, faculty, program directors, university executives, and accreditation agencies will need to align their approach to address the climate crisis.
AB - Extreme weather events fueled by climate change are intensifying. Our study found a paucity of accredited graduate healthcare or health service administration programs in the United States, Canada, and Australia that teach climate change and healthcare administration. We used a mixed-methods approach that included a website audit and program director interviews. Our website audit found that only three (.02%) of 156 accredited programs mentioned climate change in their programs or course descriptions. Course content focused on the societal impacts of climate change but did not address the leadership or managerial implications of how to mitigate and manage through climate crises. Interviews clarified factors that shaped course content, with five themes constructed–namely, curriculum integration and accreditation influence; student-driven curriculum evolution; faculty interest and an interdisciplinary approach; competency knowledge and integration; and the influence of sociopolitical contexts. Based on these findings, accredited programs would benefit from the integration of climate change and healthcare administration education. To be successful, students, faculty, program directors, university executives, and accreditation agencies will need to align their approach to address the climate crisis.
UR - https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/aupha/jhae/2025/00000041/00000001/art00006
M3 - Article
SN - 0735-6722
VL - 41
SP - 63
EP - 80
JO - Journal of Health Administration Education
JF - Journal of Health Administration Education
IS - 1
ER -