Clinician resources to improve evidence-based sexual healthcare : does content and design matter?

Hassan Hosseinzadeh, Ann Dadich, Chris Bourne, Carolyn Murray

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This study explores how the design and content of three resources influence clinicians perceived capacity to deliver evidence-based sexual healthcare. A total of 214 general practitioners in New South Wales, Australia, completed a survey about their use and perceptions of a clinical aide, articles about sexual health, and an educational booklet. Over 50% of respondents used the three resources; of these, over 70% recognized a change in knowledge and/or clinical practice. Perceptions about resource design and content collectively explained more variance in perceived impact (30.5-75.9%) than independently. However, views about content were a stronger predictor for the perceived impact of the clinical aide, while views about design were a stronger predictor for the perceived impact of the articles and booklet. Clinician perceptions about the design and content of printed educational materials have differential perceived effects on their clinical practices. For this reason, it is concluded that the promotion of evidence-based practices should be guided by resource-type and audience expectations.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)181-196
    Number of pages16
    JournalInternational Journal of Learning and Change
    Volume7
    Issue number45385
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Clinician resources to improve evidence-based sexual healthcare : does content and design matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this