Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinicians' use of sexual knowledge assessment tools for people with intellectual disability

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Many people with intellectual disability have limited sexual knowledge. Several assessment tools have been developed to assess the sexual knowledge of people with intellectual disability. This paper examines how clinicians' are using these tools. Method This research uses a constructivist grounded theory approach. Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with clinicians who use sexual knowledge assessment tools. Findings and Discussion Assessment of sexual knowledge is not routine in disability service provision. Sexual knowledge is typically only assessed when there has been an incident of problematic sexualised behaviour. This reactive approach perpetuates a pathological sexual health discourse. Conclusions Clinicians using assessment tools said that they need the tools to support work they do in relation to sexual health of people with intellectual disability. However, they also reported that the tools have gaps and are not fully meeting their needs or the needs of people with intellectual disability.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)243-254
Number of pages12
JournalAustralia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jul 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Australasian Society for Intellectual Disability, Inc.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality

Keywords

  • intellectual disability
  • medical personnel
  • sexual health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinicians' use of sexual knowledge assessment tools for people with intellectual disability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this