TY - JOUR
T1 - Closed-loop insulin delivery during pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes
AU - Stewart, Zoe A.
AU - Wilinska, Malgorzata E.
AU - Hartnell, Sara
AU - Temple, Rosemary C.
AU - Rayman, Gerry
AU - Stanley, Katharine P.
AU - Simmons, David
AU - Law, Graham R.
AU - Scott, Eleanor M.
AU - Hovorka, Roman
AU - Murphy, Helen R.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - BACKGROUND In patients with type 1 diabetes who are not pregnant, closed-loop (automated) insulin delivery can provide better glycemic control than sensor- Augmented pump therapy, but data are lacking on the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of closed-loop therapy during pregnancy. METHODS We performed an open-label, randomized, crossover study comparing overnight closed-loop therapy with sensor- Augmented pump therapy, followed by a continuation phase in which the closed-loop system was used day and night. Sixteen pregnant women with type 1 diabetes completed 4 weeks of closed-loop pump therapy (intervention) and sensor- Augmented pump therapy (control) in random order. During the continuation phase, 14 of the participants used the closed-loop system day and night until delivery. The primary outcome was the percentage of time that overnight glucose levels were within the target range (63 to 140 mg per deciliter [3.5 to 7.8 mmol per liter]). RESULTS The percentage of time that overnight glucose levels were in the target range was higher during closed-loop therapy than during control therapy (74.7% vs. 59.5%; absolute difference, 15.2 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 6.1 to 24.2; P = 0.002). The overnight mean glucose level was lower during closed-loop therapy than during control therapy (119 vs. 133 mg per deciliter [6.6 vs. 7.4 mmol per liter], P = 0.009). There were no significant differences between closed-loop and control therapy in the percentage of time in which glucose levels were below the target range (1.3% and 1.9%, respectively; P = 0.28), in insulin doses, or in adverseevent rates. During the continuation phase (up to 14.6 additional weeks, including antenatal hospitalizations, labor, and delivery), glucose levels were in the target range 68.7% of the time; the mean glucose level was 126 mg per deciliter (7.0 mmol per liter). No episodes of severe hypoglycemia requiring third-party assistance occurred during either phase. CONCLUSIONS Overnight closed-loop therapy resulted in better glucose control than sensor- Augmented pump therapy in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Women receiving day- And-night closed-loop therapy maintained glycemic control during a high proportion of the time in a period that encompassed antenatal hospital admission, labor, and delivery.
AB - BACKGROUND In patients with type 1 diabetes who are not pregnant, closed-loop (automated) insulin delivery can provide better glycemic control than sensor- Augmented pump therapy, but data are lacking on the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of closed-loop therapy during pregnancy. METHODS We performed an open-label, randomized, crossover study comparing overnight closed-loop therapy with sensor- Augmented pump therapy, followed by a continuation phase in which the closed-loop system was used day and night. Sixteen pregnant women with type 1 diabetes completed 4 weeks of closed-loop pump therapy (intervention) and sensor- Augmented pump therapy (control) in random order. During the continuation phase, 14 of the participants used the closed-loop system day and night until delivery. The primary outcome was the percentage of time that overnight glucose levels were within the target range (63 to 140 mg per deciliter [3.5 to 7.8 mmol per liter]). RESULTS The percentage of time that overnight glucose levels were in the target range was higher during closed-loop therapy than during control therapy (74.7% vs. 59.5%; absolute difference, 15.2 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 6.1 to 24.2; P = 0.002). The overnight mean glucose level was lower during closed-loop therapy than during control therapy (119 vs. 133 mg per deciliter [6.6 vs. 7.4 mmol per liter], P = 0.009). There were no significant differences between closed-loop and control therapy in the percentage of time in which glucose levels were below the target range (1.3% and 1.9%, respectively; P = 0.28), in insulin doses, or in adverseevent rates. During the continuation phase (up to 14.6 additional weeks, including antenatal hospitalizations, labor, and delivery), glucose levels were in the target range 68.7% of the time; the mean glucose level was 126 mg per deciliter (7.0 mmol per liter). No episodes of severe hypoglycemia requiring third-party assistance occurred during either phase. CONCLUSIONS Overnight closed-loop therapy resulted in better glucose control than sensor- Augmented pump therapy in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Women receiving day- And-night closed-loop therapy maintained glycemic control during a high proportion of the time in a period that encompassed antenatal hospital admission, labor, and delivery.
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:63854
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1602494
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1602494
M3 - Article
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 375
SP - 644
EP - 654
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 7
ER -