Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Closed-loop insulin delivery during pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes

  • Zoe A. Stewart
  • , Malgorzata E. Wilinska
  • , Sara Hartnell
  • , Rosemary C. Temple
  • , Gerry Rayman
  • , Katharine P. Stanley
  • , David Simmons
  • , Graham R. Law
  • , Eleanor M. Scott
  • , Roman Hovorka
  • , Helen R. Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

246 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND In patients with type 1 diabetes who are not pregnant, closed-loop (automated) insulin delivery can provide better glycemic control than sensor- Augmented pump therapy, but data are lacking on the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of closed-loop therapy during pregnancy. METHODS We performed an open-label, randomized, crossover study comparing overnight closed-loop therapy with sensor- Augmented pump therapy, followed by a continuation phase in which the closed-loop system was used day and night. Sixteen pregnant women with type 1 diabetes completed 4 weeks of closed-loop pump therapy (intervention) and sensor- Augmented pump therapy (control) in random order. During the continuation phase, 14 of the participants used the closed-loop system day and night until delivery. The primary outcome was the percentage of time that overnight glucose levels were within the target range (63 to 140 mg per deciliter [3.5 to 7.8 mmol per liter]). RESULTS The percentage of time that overnight glucose levels were in the target range was higher during closed-loop therapy than during control therapy (74.7% vs. 59.5%; absolute difference, 15.2 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 6.1 to 24.2; P = 0.002). The overnight mean glucose level was lower during closed-loop therapy than during control therapy (119 vs. 133 mg per deciliter [6.6 vs. 7.4 mmol per liter], P = 0.009). There were no significant differences between closed-loop and control therapy in the percentage of time in which glucose levels were below the target range (1.3% and 1.9%, respectively; P = 0.28), in insulin doses, or in adverseevent rates. During the continuation phase (up to 14.6 additional weeks, including antenatal hospitalizations, labor, and delivery), glucose levels were in the target range 68.7% of the time; the mean glucose level was 126 mg per deciliter (7.0 mmol per liter). No episodes of severe hypoglycemia requiring third-party assistance occurred during either phase. CONCLUSIONS Overnight closed-loop therapy resulted in better glucose control than sensor- Augmented pump therapy in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Women receiving day- And-night closed-loop therapy maintained glycemic control during a high proportion of the time in a period that encompassed antenatal hospital admission, labor, and delivery.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)644-654
Number of pages11
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume375
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Closed-loop insulin delivery during pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this