Abstract
Background/Aims - Gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) is the reference standard test for diagnosing gastroparesis. Body surface gastric mapping (BSGM) via Gastric Alimetry is a new test of gastric function that combines non-invasive assessment of gastric electrophysiology and validated symptom profiling. This randomized, prospective pilot study evaluated the impact of GES vs BSGM test results on clinical decision-making.
Methods - Patients with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms from a tertiary center referred for GES were recruited. Subjects separately underwent baseline assessment with GES and BSGM testing. Two motility-specialists were first asked to devise a management plan after reviewing a test result (GES or BSGM, in random order). They were then asked to repeat the management plan after reviewing the other test result (BSGM or GES). Clinician-perceived certainty measures were assessed. Results - Sixteen patients, 13 (81.0%) female, median age 30 years, median body mass index 22.5 kg/m², were recruited. At baseline, a diagnosis was established in 2/16 (12.5%) and increased to 8/16 (50.0%) with both tests. Abnormal test results were found in 11 patients. In patients with normal results, BSGM symptom profiling phenotyped 5 additional patients. All patients received an intervention following the first unblinding, with subsequent management changes made in 75.0% (BSGM) and 62.5% (GES) of patients. The combined GES and BSGM results significantly increased diagnostic and management certainty (P < 0.05), with both tests having similar influence on management (P > 0.05). Conclusion - The combined GES and BSGM test results significantly enhanced diagnostic and management confidence in patients with suspected gastroparesis within a tertiary center.
Methods - Patients with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms from a tertiary center referred for GES were recruited. Subjects separately underwent baseline assessment with GES and BSGM testing. Two motility-specialists were first asked to devise a management plan after reviewing a test result (GES or BSGM, in random order). They were then asked to repeat the management plan after reviewing the other test result (BSGM or GES). Clinician-perceived certainty measures were assessed. Results - Sixteen patients, 13 (81.0%) female, median age 30 years, median body mass index 22.5 kg/m², were recruited. At baseline, a diagnosis was established in 2/16 (12.5%) and increased to 8/16 (50.0%) with both tests. Abnormal test results were found in 11 patients. In patients with normal results, BSGM symptom profiling phenotyped 5 additional patients. All patients received an intervention following the first unblinding, with subsequent management changes made in 75.0% (BSGM) and 62.5% (GES) of patients. The combined GES and BSGM results significantly increased diagnostic and management certainty (P < 0.05), with both tests having similar influence on management (P > 0.05). Conclusion - The combined GES and BSGM test results significantly enhanced diagnostic and management confidence in patients with suspected gastroparesis within a tertiary center.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 61-70 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2026 |