Combining assessment scores : a variable feast

Ian Wilson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: In medical education grades are often determined by combining the scores of different assessments. While the psychometric literature recommends that the variance in each assessment be identical, there is limited discussion of the impact of different methods of combining scores. Method: Eight mock assessment results were created and used to develop an overall assessment that consisted of four types of assessments that were undertaken twice in a year. Various methods of combining scores were then used. The methods used two mechanisms for standardising results and a number of algorithms for combining scores. The impact of using the standard error of measurement was also investigated. Results: The number of 'students' failing ranged from five (simple addition of scores/8) to 30 (standardisation of scores, add scores/8, plus pass each type of assessment). Discussion: There is a large variation in the number of students failing associated with different methods of combining scores. Conclusion: Choosing a method to produce a combined score is a non-trivial exercise. The impact on student progression can be significant and whatever method is chosen will require justification.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)428-430
    Number of pages3
    JournalMedical Teacher
    Volume30
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Combining assessment scores : a variable feast'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this