Commentary on: is endoanal, introital or transperineal ultrasound diagnosis of sphincter defects more strongly associated with anal incontinence?

Moshe Gillor; Ka Lai Shek; Hans Peter Dietz

doi:10.1007/s00192-020-04347-9

Commentary on: is endoanal, introital or transperineal ultrasound diagnosis of sphincter defects more strongly associated with anal incontinence?

Moshe Gillor
, Ka Lai Shek
, Hans Peter Dietz

Western Sydney University

Hebrew University of Jerusalem
The University of Sydney
Western Sydney University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This was a cross-sectional study evaluating assessment of anal sphincter defects after obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) with endoanal, introital and transperineal ultrasound, assessing the predictive value for diagnosing anal incontinence (AI).

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1489-1490
Number of pages	2
Journal	International Urogynecology Journal
Volume	31
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04347-9
Publication status	Published - Jul 2020

Access to Document

10.1007/s00192-020-04347-9

Cite this

@article{87596ccef6154d858a6a99c29145a3ad,

title = "Commentary on: is endoanal, introital or transperineal ultrasound diagnosis of sphincter defects more strongly associated with anal incontinence?",

abstract = "This was a cross-sectional study evaluating assessment of anal sphincter defects after obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) with endoanal, introital and transperineal ultrasound, assessing the predictive value for diagnosing anal incontinence (AI).",

author = "Moshe Gillor and Shek, \{Ka Lai\} and Dietz, \{Hans Peter\}",

year = "2020",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1007/s00192-020-04347-9",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

pages = "1489--1490",

journal = "International Urogynecology Journal",

issn = "0937-3462",

publisher = "Springer Nature",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary on

T2 - is endoanal, introital or transperineal ultrasound diagnosis of sphincter defects more strongly associated with anal incontinence?

AU - Gillor, Moshe

AU - Shek, Ka Lai

AU - Dietz, Hans Peter

PY - 2020/7

Y1 - 2020/7

N2 - This was a cross-sectional study evaluating assessment of anal sphincter defects after obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) with endoanal, introital and transperineal ultrasound, assessing the predictive value for diagnosing anal incontinence (AI).

AB - This was a cross-sectional study evaluating assessment of anal sphincter defects after obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) with endoanal, introital and transperineal ultrasound, assessing the predictive value for diagnosing anal incontinence (AI).

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85085318496

UR - https://go.openathens.net/redirector/westernsydney.edu.au?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04347-9

U2 - 10.1007/s00192-020-04347-9

DO - 10.1007/s00192-020-04347-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 32448936

AN - SCOPUS:85085318496

SN - 0937-3462

VL - 31

SP - 1489

EP - 1490

JO - International Urogynecology Journal

JF - International Urogynecology Journal

IS - 7

ER -

Commentary on: is endoanal, introital or transperineal ultrasound diagnosis of sphincter defects more strongly associated with anal incontinence?

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this