Commentary on Wibe et al.

Les Bokey

doi:10.1111/codi.12409

Commentary on Wibe et al.

Les Bokey

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In this issue of the journal invites the reader to consider tailoring treatment for rectal cancer rather than accepting recommended guidelines alone and I resonate with this principle. The author's aim is to highlight features, apart from tumour stage, that are known to be prognostic in rectal cancer but are not currently incorporated in treatment guidelines and to advocate that individually tailored treatment should take account of these features as well as the tumour stage.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1342-1344
Number of pages	3
Journal	Colorectal Disease
Volume	15
Issue number	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12409
Publication status	Published - 2013

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Access to Document

10.1111/codi.12409

Cite this

@article{23e6f0c29ada4d0db5a1ea375936ad3a,

title = "Commentary on Wibe et al.",

abstract = "In this issue of the journal invites the reader to consider tailoring treatment for rectal cancer rather than accepting recommended guidelines alone and I resonate with this principle. The author's aim is to highlight features, apart from tumour stage, that are known to be prognostic in rectal cancer but are not currently incorporated in treatment guidelines and to advocate that individually tailored treatment should take account of these features as well as the tumour stage.",

author = "Les Bokey",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1111/codi.12409",

language = "English",

volume = "15",

pages = "1342--1344",

journal = "Colorectal Disease",

issn = "1462-8910",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc",

number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary on Wibe et al.

AU - Bokey, Les

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - In this issue of the journal invites the reader to consider tailoring treatment for rectal cancer rather than accepting recommended guidelines alone and I resonate with this principle. The author's aim is to highlight features, apart from tumour stage, that are known to be prognostic in rectal cancer but are not currently incorporated in treatment guidelines and to advocate that individually tailored treatment should take account of these features as well as the tumour stage.

AB - In this issue of the journal invites the reader to consider tailoring treatment for rectal cancer rather than accepting recommended guidelines alone and I resonate with this principle. The author's aim is to highlight features, apart from tumour stage, that are known to be prognostic in rectal cancer but are not currently incorporated in treatment guidelines and to advocate that individually tailored treatment should take account of these features as well as the tumour stage.

UR - http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/538090

U2 - 10.1111/codi.12409

DO - 10.1111/codi.12409

M3 - Article

C2 - 24192256

SN - 1462-8910

VL - 15

SP - 1342

EP - 1344

JO - Colorectal Disease

JF - Colorectal Disease

IS - 11

ER -

Commentary on Wibe et al.

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this