Community-based rehabilitation in Fiji : evaluation of the competency, assessment, and local solutions (CAL) programme

S. McIntyre, J. Newland, N. Ison, J. Salmon, C. Pearce

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperConference Paperpeer-review

    Abstract

    ![CDATA[Background: Approximately 12 000 people with a disability live in the developing country of Fiji, yet only 0.2% of those requiring services have access to them. The competency based training, assessment and consultancy, and local/community participation activities (CAL) programme is a 3 year programme aiming to address the needs of children with disabilities in Fiji. It supports immediate health solutions, skill development for community rehabilitation assistants (CRAs), health workers, parents and teachers, and culminating in sustainability. Objectives: To evaluate the first 2 years of the CAL programme regarding efficiency, quality and effectiveness and to make recommendations for ongoing sustainability and improved implementation. Design: A multiple stakeholder case study design was utilised, allowing evaluation of the programme in its real world setting. Participants/Setting: Stakeholders including families, CRAs, teachers, health workers and representatives of external stakeholder organisations. Materials/Methods: A multi-faceted mixed method data collection approach was utilised. Quantitative and qualitative data was collected using semi-structured questionnaires (n = 53), interviews (n = 4), focus groups (n = 3 with 41 participants), record reviews and field observations. Quantitative data was collated with descriptive statistics and qualitative data transcribed and thematically coded. Results: Efficiency – CRAs (13 i.e. 100% completion), teachers and health care workers have been trained through the programme and are now implementing assessments, detailed individualised rehabilitation goals and plans, and interventions. Quality – High program satisfaction rates were reported by all stakeholders (75% to 94%), with identified program strengths including knowledge gain, service provision, sustainability, community approach and expertise of facilitators. Contextual factors identified that may influence ongoing success of the programme included policy, legislative, political, access and financial issues. Parents report feeling more confident and informed. Stakeholders commonly recommended that further outcome improvement could be achieved by training more people. Effectiveness – 77% of participants felt that community perception of disability had changed for the better as a result of the programme. 100% of CRAs reported skill transfer to children with disabilities and their families, and 100%of children assessed are now provided with a detailed action plan including functional goals. Participants reported greater confidence, communication skills, assessment skills and skills in developing and actioning appropriate plans for their clients. Conclusions/Clinical Implications: The CAL programme is producing positive outcomes. Recommendations include: continuation and extension of the programme; increasing number of CRAs trained; ongoing communication with stakeholders to raise awareness of the programme; inclusion of outcome measures to evaluate effectiveness; and a focus during the third year on future sustainability of the programme.]]
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationInternational Cerebral Palsy Conference, 18-21 February 2009, Sydney, Australia: Conference Proceedings
    PublisherCerebral Palsy Foundation
    Pages77-77
    Number of pages1
    Publication statusPublished - 2009
    EventInternational Cerebral Palsy Conference -
    Duration: 1 Jan 2009 → …

    Conference

    ConferenceInternational Cerebral Palsy Conference
    Period1/01/09 → …

    Keywords

    • rehabilitation
    • disabiities
    • Fiji

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Community-based rehabilitation in Fiji : evaluation of the competency, assessment, and local solutions (CAL) programme'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this