TY - JOUR
T1 - Community-level determinants of loneliness and social isolation
T2 - a population-based cohort study across younger and older adults
AU - Meehan, Drew Eleanor
AU - Clare, Philip
AU - Grunseit, Anne
AU - Merom, Dafna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Meehan, Clare, Grunseit and Merom.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Introduction: Loneliness and social isolation (SI) are critical public health issues with well-documented effects on health and well-being. However, much of existing observational and intervention research has focused predominantly on individual-and interpersonal-level factors. This longitudinal study addresses significant knowledge gaps by comprehensively examining the independent influence of multiple community-level determinants on loneliness and SI and uniquely comparing these effects across younger (18–30 year) and older (60 + years) adults within an Australian population cohort over a 12-year period. Methods: Using longitudinal data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, we analysed data from four wave pairs (2006/07, 2010/11, 2014/15, 2018/19) to investigate associations between loneliness and SI and nine community and neighbourhood-level variables. We employed lagged mixed-effects Poisson regression models to calculate risk ratios (RR) adjusted for individual-and interpersonal-level factors. Results: Our findings reveal that low community engagement is the strongest risk factor for loneliness and SI in both younger (Loneliness, RR = 1.34; SI, RR = 1.58) and older populations (Loneliness, RR = 1.35; SI = 2.02). Low neighbourhood social cohesion was found to significantly increase loneliness and SI in older adults (Loneliness, RR = 1.15; SI, RR = 1.36) and to increase SI in younger adults (RR = 1.54). We also observed distinct age-specific effects, with cultural practices, altruism, and perceived neighbourhood safety having differential impacts across age groups. Discussion: Our findings highlight the critical need for community-level interventions to address loneliness and SI, suggesting that focusing solely on individual-related factors is insufficient. Tailoring public health strategies to enhance community dynamics may be essential in reducing loneliness and SI among vulnerable populations, particularly in areas with low social cohesion and community engagement offerings.
AB - Introduction: Loneliness and social isolation (SI) are critical public health issues with well-documented effects on health and well-being. However, much of existing observational and intervention research has focused predominantly on individual-and interpersonal-level factors. This longitudinal study addresses significant knowledge gaps by comprehensively examining the independent influence of multiple community-level determinants on loneliness and SI and uniquely comparing these effects across younger (18–30 year) and older (60 + years) adults within an Australian population cohort over a 12-year period. Methods: Using longitudinal data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, we analysed data from four wave pairs (2006/07, 2010/11, 2014/15, 2018/19) to investigate associations between loneliness and SI and nine community and neighbourhood-level variables. We employed lagged mixed-effects Poisson regression models to calculate risk ratios (RR) adjusted for individual-and interpersonal-level factors. Results: Our findings reveal that low community engagement is the strongest risk factor for loneliness and SI in both younger (Loneliness, RR = 1.34; SI, RR = 1.58) and older populations (Loneliness, RR = 1.35; SI = 2.02). Low neighbourhood social cohesion was found to significantly increase loneliness and SI in older adults (Loneliness, RR = 1.15; SI, RR = 1.36) and to increase SI in younger adults (RR = 1.54). We also observed distinct age-specific effects, with cultural practices, altruism, and perceived neighbourhood safety having differential impacts across age groups. Discussion: Our findings highlight the critical need for community-level interventions to address loneliness and SI, suggesting that focusing solely on individual-related factors is insufficient. Tailoring public health strategies to enhance community dynamics may be essential in reducing loneliness and SI among vulnerable populations, particularly in areas with low social cohesion and community engagement offerings.
KW - community-level
KW - loneliness
KW - longitudinal
KW - public health
KW - social isolation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105006903917&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1526166
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1526166
M3 - Article
C2 - 40443933
AN - SCOPUS:105006903917
SN - 2296-2565
VL - 13
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
JF - Frontiers in Public Health
M1 - 1526166
ER -