Comparative analysis of algorithmic approaches for auto-coding with ICD-10-AM and ACHI

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clinical coding is done using ICD-10-AM (International Classification of Diseases, version 10, Australian Modification) and ACHI (Australian Classification of Health Interventions) in acute and sub-acute hospitals in Australia for funding, insurance claims processing and research. The task of assigning a code to an episode of care is a manual process. This has posed challenges due to increase set of codes, the complexity of care episodes, and large training and recruitment costs of clinical coders. Use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques is considered as a solution to this problem. This paper carries out a comparative analysis on a selected set of NLP and ML techniques to identify the most efficient algorithm for clinical coding based on a set of standard metrics: precision, recall, F-score, accuracy, Hamming loss and Jaccard similarity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-79
Number of pages7
JournalStudies in Health Technology and Informatics
Volume252
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Open Access - Access Right Statement

© 2018 The authors and IOS Press. This article is published online with Open Access by IOS Press and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)

Keywords

  • Australia
  • computational linguistics
  • data processing
  • diagnosis related groups
  • machine learning
  • medical records

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative analysis of algorithmic approaches for auto-coding with ICD-10-AM and ACHI'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this