Comparative and forward-looking conclusions on transboundary MSP

Niko Soininen, Tuomas Kuokkanen, Daud Hassan

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In conclusion, the governance framework of MSP can be seen as facilitating the process and encouraging transboundary cooperation. The governance framework of MSP creates broad procedural and substantive boundaries for MSP cooperation, which are complemented by softer instruments, emphasizing the importance of voluntary MSP cooperation. The procedural nature of MSP makes it a continuing journey for sustainable and integrated ocean governance. MSP appears to share the same strengths and weaknesses as sustainable development, which it seeks to implement. As a consequence, MSP is not able to escape the problems of fragmentation but, at the same time, this is not one of its strengths; countries can come together and adapt MSP to their needs to advance common goals. One of the central characteristics of both MSP and its governance framework is adaptivitity.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationTransboundary Marine Spatial Planning and International Law
    EditorsDaud Hassan, Tuomas Kuokkanen, Niko Soininen
    Place of PublicationU.K.
    PublisherRoutledge
    Pages221-226
    Number of pages6
    ISBN (Electronic)9781315816425
    ISBN (Print)9780415739702
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Keywords

    • international law
    • law of the sea
    • marine ecosystem management

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative and forward-looking conclusions on transboundary MSP'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this