Abstract
Legal transplants, or law reform via the borrowing of legal ideas from another jurisdiction, are an established method in comparative law. In response to a problem identified in the home jurisdiction, lawmakers may seek possible law reform solutions by looking at what other jurisdictions do in response to that problem, with a view to importing the foreign solution (Danneman 2008, p.400). This chapter considers what legal geography has to offer in mitigating a problem with legal transplants as a method of law reform. The borrowed laws of the "transplantor" jurisdiction may be insufficiently adapted to the human and environmental contexts of the "transplantee" juriscition" there may be a poor "'fit' between the transferred law and the local context" (Graziadei 2008, p.472). This chapter proposes incorporating legal geography into comparative law methodology, as a means to bring a critical perspective to the ways in which social and environmental context complicates law reform proposals based on legal transplants.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Legal Geography: Perspectives and Methods |
| Editors | Tayanah O'Donnell, Daniel F. Robinson, Josephine Gillespie |
| Place of Publication | U.K. |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Pages | 149-166 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780429426308 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781138387379 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- law reform
- comparative law
- law and geography