Comparison of nutrition properties of stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) flour with wheat and barley flours

Bhaskar Mani Adhikari, Alina Bajracharya, Ashok K. Shrestha

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Stinging nettle (Urtica dioica. L) is a wild, unique herbaceous perennial flowering plant with stinging hairs. It has a long history of use as a food sources as a soup or curries, and also used as a fiber as well as a medicinal herb. The current aim was to analyze the composition and bioactive compounds in Nepalese Stinging nettle. Chemical analysis showed the relatively higher level of crude protein (33.8%), crude fiber (9.1%), crude fat (3.6%), total ash (16.2%), carbohydrate (37.4%), and relatively lower energy value (307 kcal/100 g) as compared to wheat and barley flours. Analysis of nettle powder showed significantly higher level of bioactive compounds: phenolic compounds as 129 mg Gallic acid equivalent/g; carotenoid level 3497 μg/g; tannin 0.93 mg/100 g; anti-oxidant activity 66.3 DPPH inhibition (%), as compared to wheat and barley. This study further established that nettle plants as very good source of energy, proteins, high fiber, and a range of health benefitting bioactive compounds.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)119-124
    Number of pages6
    JournalFood Science and Nutrition
    Volume4
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Open Access - Access Right Statement

    © 2015 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Keywords

    • barley
    • flour
    • stinging nettle
    • wheat

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of nutrition properties of stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) flour with wheat and barley flours'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this