Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of the effects of low- versus high-supervision exercise on breast cancer survivorship outcomes

  • Kira Bloomquist
  • , Rosalind R. Spence
  • , Dimitrios Vagenas
  • , Christopher Pyke
  • , Carolina X. Sandler
  • , Sheree Rye
  • , Leonie Young
  • , Sandra C. Hayes
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Cancer Council Queensland
  • Queensland University of Technology
  • Mater Group
  • University of Queensland
  • University of New South Wales
  • UnitingCare Health

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Supervised exercise may provide greater functional and quality of life benefits than unsupervised programs after cancer and is recommended for those with or at risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema. These exploratory analyses compared the effect of low- vs high-supervision exercise on the secondary survivorship outcomes of the SAFE breast cancer trial. Methods This randomized study (ANZCTR: ACTRN12616000547448) compared a 12-week exercise program (target 150min.week−1, moderate intensity) supported by either 5 (low supervision [LOW]) or 20 (high supervision [HIGH)] supervised sessions. Inclusion criteria included: stage II+ breast cancer within 5 years, ≥1 comorbidity and/or treatment-related adverse effect, and insufficiently active. Outcomes included lymphedema (self-report and bioimpedance spectroscopy), arm symptoms, upper-extremity function (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Bank v1.2-Upper-Extremity), fatigue, pain, pain interference, pain intensity, physical function, sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression, and satisfaction with social roles (PROMIS-43 Profile v1.0). Chi-square tests evaluated between-group symptom changes. Generalized estimating equations assessed time, group, and time×group effects under an intention-to-treat, 2-sided framework. Results Sixty women (mean age, 50years) were randomized to LOW (n=30) vs HIGH (n=30). At follow-up, both groups showed similar lymphedema prevalence, comparable rates of maintained or improved arm symptoms, and within-group improvements (P<.05) in fatigue, physical function, sleep, anxiety, depression, and satisfaction with social roles and activities. Potential for superior benefit in HIGH vs LOW was observed for self-reported range of movement, upper-extremity function, and pain interference and intensity (P<.05). Conclusion Findings indicate that breast cancer survivors with or at risk of lymphedema can benefit from exercise, even when supervision is limited.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberpkag004
JournalJNCI Cancer Spectrum
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2026
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the effects of low- versus high-supervision exercise on breast cancer survivorship outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this