Comprehensive glycomics comparison between colon cancer cell cultures and tumours : implications for biomarker studies

Jenny H. L. Chik, Jerry Zhou, Edward S. X. Moh, Richard Christopherson, Stephen J. Clarke, Mark P. Molloy, Nicolle H. Packer

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    55 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Altered glycosylation is commonly observed in colorectal cancer. In vitro models are frequently used to study this cancer but little is known about the differences that may exist between these model cell systems and tumour tissue. We have compared the membrane protein glycosylation of five colorectal cancer cell lines (SW1116, SW480, SW620, SW837, LS174T) with epithelial cells from colorectal tumours using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Remarkably, there were five abundant O-glycans in the tumour cells that were undetected in the low-mucin producing cell lines, although two were found in the mucinous LS174T cells. The O-glycans included the well-known glycan cancer marker, sialyl-Tn, which has been associated with mucins. Using qRT-PCR, sialyl-Tn expression was found to be associated with an increase in α2,6-sialyltransferase gene (ST6GALNAC1) and a decrease in core 1 synthase gene (C1GALT1) in LS174T cells. The expression of a subset of mucins (MUC2, MUC6, MUC5B) was also correlated with sialyl-Tn expression in LS174T cells. Overall, the membrane protein glycosylation of the model cell lines was found to differ from each other and from the epithelial cells of tumour tissue. These findings should be noted in the design of biomarker discovery experiments particularly when cell surface targets are being investigated.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)146-162
    Number of pages17
    JournalJournal of Proteomics
    Volume108
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comprehensive glycomics comparison between colon cancer cell cultures and tumours : implications for biomarker studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this