TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus-based perspectives of pediatric inpatient eating disorder services
AU - O'Brien, Amy
AU - McCormack, Julie
AU - Hoiles, Kimberley J.
AU - Watson, Hunna J.
AU - Anderson, Rebecca A.
AU - Hay, Phillipa
AU - Egan, Sarah J.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Objective: There are few evidence-based guidelines for inpatient pediatric eating disorders. The aim was to gain perspectives from those providing and receiving inpatient pediatric eating disorder care on the essential components treatment. Method: A modified Delphi technique was used to develop consensus-based opinions. Participants (N=74) were recruited for three panels: clinicians (n=24), carers (n=31), and patients (n=19), who endorsed three rounds of statements online. Results: A total of 167 statements were rated, 79 were accepted and reached a consensus level of at least 75% across all panels, and 87 were rejected. All agreed that families should be involved in treatment, and that psychological therapy be offered in specialist inpatient units. Areas of disagreement included that patients expressed a desire for autonomy in sessions being available without carers, and that weight gain should be gradual and admissions longer, in contrast to carers and clinicians. Carers endorsed that legal frameworks should be used to retain patients if required, and that inpatients are supervised at all times, in contrast to patients and clinicians. Clinicians endorsed that food access should be restricted outside meal times, in contrast to patients and carers. Discussion: The findings indicate areas of consensus in admission criteria, and that families should be involved in treatment, family involvement in treatment, while there was disagreement across groups on topics including weight goals and nutrition management. Perspectives from patients, carers, and clinicians may be useful to consider during future revisions of best practice guidelines.
AB - Objective: There are few evidence-based guidelines for inpatient pediatric eating disorders. The aim was to gain perspectives from those providing and receiving inpatient pediatric eating disorder care on the essential components treatment. Method: A modified Delphi technique was used to develop consensus-based opinions. Participants (N=74) were recruited for three panels: clinicians (n=24), carers (n=31), and patients (n=19), who endorsed three rounds of statements online. Results: A total of 167 statements were rated, 79 were accepted and reached a consensus level of at least 75% across all panels, and 87 were rejected. All agreed that families should be involved in treatment, and that psychological therapy be offered in specialist inpatient units. Areas of disagreement included that patients expressed a desire for autonomy in sessions being available without carers, and that weight gain should be gradual and admissions longer, in contrast to carers and clinicians. Carers endorsed that legal frameworks should be used to retain patients if required, and that inpatients are supervised at all times, in contrast to patients and clinicians. Clinicians endorsed that food access should be restricted outside meal times, in contrast to patients and carers. Discussion: The findings indicate areas of consensus in admission criteria, and that families should be involved in treatment, family involvement in treatment, while there was disagreement across groups on topics including weight goals and nutrition management. Perspectives from patients, carers, and clinicians may be useful to consider during future revisions of best practice guidelines.
KW - Delphi method
KW - consumers
KW - eating disorders
KW - pediatrics
KW - treatment
UR - http://handle.westernsydney.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:47295
U2 - 10.1002/eat.22857
DO - 10.1002/eat.22857
M3 - Article
SN - 0276-3478
VL - 51
SP - 401
EP - 410
JO - International Journal of Eating Disorders
JF - International Journal of Eating Disorders
IS - 5
ER -