Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Consistent topsoil carbon density and driving factors in urban greenspaces and natural ecosystems

  • Beatriz Jiménez-Prieto
  • , Pablo García-Palacios
  • , Carmen Lorenzo-Rodríguez
  • , Elena Aguilar-Santana
  • , Josu G. Alday
  • , Camelia Algora
  • , Cristian Carrillo-Guzmán
  • , Cristina Armas
  • , Felipe Bastida
  • , Leonor Calvo
  • , María D. Carmona-Yáñez
  • , Axel Campos-Castro
  • , Nuria Casado-Coy
  • , Giada Centenaro
  • , Sonia Chamizo
  • , Joana Costa
  • , Svetlana Dashevskaya
  • , Jorge Durán
  • , María J. Fernández-Alonso
  • , Daniela Figueira
  • Eva Garcia, Enrique G. de la Riva, Ana López-Velasco, Manuel E. Lucas-Borja, Santiago Martín-Bravo, Ivan Prieto, Jesús Pérez-López, Pedro A. Plaza-Alvárez, Alexandra Rodríguez, Tadeo Sáez-Sandino, Carlos Sanz-Lazaro, Santiago Soliveres, Aurora Torres, Carlos Urueta-Urueta, Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo, María Leo
  • CSIC - Institute of Agricultural Sciences
  • University of Zurich
  • CSIC
  • University of Lleida
  • CSIC - Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (EEZA)
  • CEBAS- CSIC - Centre of Edafology and Applied Biology of Segura 
  • University of Leon
  • University of Castilla-La Mancha
  • University of Alicante
  • University of Coimbra
  • CSIC - Biological Mission of Galicia
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Universidad Pablo de Olavide
  • University of Almeria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Urban greenspaces have the potential to mitigate urban carbon footprints by storing soil organic carbon (SOC). Different management and plant communities associated with different types of urban greenspaces may hold contrasting SOC, as well as different proportions of particulate (POC) and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC). In addition, management could outweigh the effects of climate or soil properties as drivers of urban SOC storage, in contrast with natural environments. Methods: We analyzed SOC, POC and MAOC densities (kg m−2) in topsoil (0-10 cm) across 27 cities in the Iberian Peninsula with contrasting climatic and edaphic conditions. At each city, we compared four types of urban greenspaces (golf courses, roundabouts, urban farms, and parks) with a nearby natural ecosystem. Results: Results revealed that, despite large differences in their typology, contrasting urban greenspaces stored comparable topsoil SOC and MAOC densities to natural ecosystems. Golf courses and urban farms also showed similar POC density to natural ecosystems, whereas parks and roundabouts had lower amounts of this carbon fraction. Consistent with global natural patterns, MAOC dominated over POC in the topsoil, and both carbon fractions showed an inverse correlation with mean annual temperature. While MAOC exhibited saturation at higher SOC levels, POC steadily increased. Conclusion: Although urban greenspaces are usually neglected in global soil carbon assessments, our study shows that, compared to natural ecosystems (median: 2.42 kg m−2; interquartile range: 1.77), these areas store an equally important density of carbon in the topsoil (median: 2.26 kg m−2; interquartile range: 1.30), and this carbon exhibits similar fraction dominance, temperature influence, and saturation across large spatial gradients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1869-1884
Number of pages16
JournalPlant and Soil
Volume521
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Mineral-associated organic carbon
  • Particulate organic carbon
  • Soil organic carbon
  • Urban ecosystems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consistent topsoil carbon density and driving factors in urban greenspaces and natural ecosystems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this