Construction error and optimal inspection rate

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperConference Paper

Abstract

Discussion of error rates in construction involves issues ranging from the origins of error; to error detection, planning for repairs and optimisation of inspection costs. The problem of determining optimum rates of inspection for simple tasks has not received a great deal of attention from researchers. To address this issue a rework model is presented by means of a flowchart. Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) is then used for the systematic break-down of error and calculation of the probability of error of the top event. A simulation model is developed which incorporates learning and forgetting effects and calculates the predicted number of errors requiring rework for a completed task. A Minimum Cost Model (MCM) has been applied to calculate the total cost of inspection and rejection for a simple reinforced concrete slab. Results are presented for three circumstances; 100% inspection; less than 100% inspection; and less than 100% inspection but incorporating learning and forgetting effects. The evidence suggests that incorporation of both MCM and learning and forgetting effects on error rate is the most appropriate strategy.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInnovations in Structural Engineering and Construction: Proceedings of the 4th International Structural and Construction Engineering Conference (ISEC-4), Melbourne, Australia, 26-28 September 2007
PublisherTaylor & Francis
Number of pages7
ISBN (Print)9780415457552
Publication statusPublished - 2007
EventInternational Structural Engineering and Construction Conference -
Duration: 22 Sept 2009 → …

Conference

ConferenceInternational Structural Engineering and Construction Conference
Period22/09/09 → …

Keywords

  • defects
  • building inspection
  • building
  • costs
  • Minimum Cost Model
  • concrete slabs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Construction error and optimal inspection rate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this