Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Continuous monitoring of plant water potential: sensor-based approaches and best practices

  • Ana Maria Restrepo-Acevedo
  • , Jessica Guo
  • , Kimberly Novick
  • , Vincent Humphrey
  • , Roman Zweifel
  • , Alexandra G. Konings
  • , George Koch
  • , John Knowles
  • , Leander D. L. Anderegg
  • , Jennifer M. R. Peters
  • , Sharath Paligi
  • , H. Jochen Schenk
  • , Daniel Beverly
  • , Ruth Kristina Magh
  • , Yitong Yao
  • , Christina A. Hackmann
  • , Gil Bohrer
  • , Marvin Browne
  • , Andrea Carminati
  • , Steven A. Kannenberg
  • West Virginia University
  • Indiana University Bloomington
  • Harvey Mudd College
  • Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology—MeteoSwiss
  • University of Zurich
  • Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
  • Stanford University
  • Northern Arizona University
  • Montana State University
  • University of California at Santa Barbara
  • NM State University
  • University of Göttingen
  • California State University Fullerton
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena
  • Tsinghua University
  • Ohio State University
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Plant water potential is a central integrator of plant water status, linking hydraulic function with physiological performance and ecosystem water dynamics across species and systems. This review is motivated by the need to capture these dynamics under rapidly changing environmental conditions, which are often missed by discrete measurements. We evaluate the main approaches for continuous monitoring of plant water potential, including direct in situ sensors, indirect methods based on plant water content, and remote-sensing proxies. We discuss the principles, measurement mechanisms, practical constraints, and environmental sensitivities of each approach. Relative to traditional methods, such as pressure chambers, continuous measurements offer major advantages by resolving rapid variation in water status and strengthening inference on plant–soil–atmosphere interactions. These approaches are especially valuable under dynamic field conditions, where temporal variability in vapor pressure deficit, soil moisture, temperature, and radiation strongly shapes hydraulic behavior. We conclude that continuous monitoring has substantial potential to advance plant and ecosystem science, but wider application will depend on careful interpretation and greater harmonization across comparable methodologies. By synthesizing core principles, methodological challenges and best practices, this review provides a practical framework for researchers and practitioners applying continuous water potential measurements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)569-588
Number of pages20
JournalNew Phytologist
Volume251
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2026

Keywords

  • field work
  • plant hydraulics
  • plants
  • sensors
  • water potential

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Continuous monitoring of plant water potential: sensor-based approaches and best practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this