TY - JOUR
T1 - Continuous product innovation : a comparision of key elements across different contingency sets
AU - Chapman, Ross L.
AU - O'Mara, Charles Edward
AU - Ronchi, Stefano
AU - Corso, Mariano
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - This paper discusses results from an international study of continuous improvement in product innovation. The empirical research is based upon a theoretical model of continuous product innovation (CPI) that identifies contingencies, behaviours, levers and performances relevant to improving product innovation processes. As successful knowledge management is widely recognised as a key capability for firms to successfully develop CPI, companies have been classified according to identified contingencies and the impact of these contingencies on key knowledge management criteria. Comparative analysis of the identified groups of companies has demonstrated important differences between the learning behaviours found present in the two groups thus identified, and in the levers used to develop and support these behaviours. The selection of performance measures by the two groups has highlighted further significant differences in the way the two groups understand and measure their CPI processes. Finally, the paper includes a discussion of appropriate mechanisms for firms with similar contingency sets to improve their approaches to organisational learning and product innovation.
AB - This paper discusses results from an international study of continuous improvement in product innovation. The empirical research is based upon a theoretical model of continuous product innovation (CPI) that identifies contingencies, behaviours, levers and performances relevant to improving product innovation processes. As successful knowledge management is widely recognised as a key capability for firms to successfully develop CPI, companies have been classified according to identified contingencies and the impact of these contingencies on key knowledge management criteria. Comparative analysis of the identified groups of companies has demonstrated important differences between the learning behaviours found present in the two groups thus identified, and in the levers used to develop and support these behaviours. The selection of performance measures by the two groups has highlighted further significant differences in the way the two groups understand and measure their CPI processes. Finally, the paper includes a discussion of appropriate mechanisms for firms with similar contingency sets to improve their approaches to organisational learning and product innovation.
KW - benchmarking (management)
KW - knowledge management
KW - organizational learning
KW - product management
KW - technological innovations
KW - total quality management
UR - http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/10599
U2 - 10.1108/EUM0000000005866
DO - 10.1108/EUM0000000005866
M3 - Article
SN - 1368-3047
JO - Measuring Business Excellence
JF - Measuring Business Excellence
ER -