Contrasting pathways to tree longevity in gymnosperms and angiosperms

Roel J.W. Brienen, Giuliano Maselli Locosselli, Stefan Krottenthaler, Emanuel Gloor, Robyn Wrigley, Steven L. Voelker, Jan Altman, Nela Altmanova, Leander D.L. Anderegg, Michele Baliva, Deepak Barua, Vaclav Bazant, Bryan Black, Peter M. Brown, Gregorio Ceccantini, R. Justin DeRose, Jose Villanueva Diaz, Alfredo Di Filippo, Jiri Dolezal, Louis DuchesneChristopher Earle, Pavel Fibich, Hardy Griesbauer, Samuli Helama, Stefan Klesse, Kirill Korznikov, David Lindenmayer, Shuhui Liu, Lidio Lopez, Maurizio Mencuccini, Thomas A. Nagel, Jakob Pavlin, Neil Pederson, Gianluca Piovesan, Christina Restaino, Peter B. Reich, David Sauchyn, Jochen Schöngart, John D. Shaw, Dan Smith, Ron Sunny, Miroslav Svoboda, Ricardo Villalba, Lisa J. Wood, Chunyu Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Tree longevity is thought to increase in growth-limiting, adverse environments, but a quantitative assessment of drivers of global variation in tree longevity is lacking. We assemble a global database of maximum longevity for 739 tree species and analyse associations between longevity and climate, soil, and species’ functional traits. Our results show two primary pathways towards long lifespans. The first is slow growth in resource-limited environments, consistent with the “adversity begets longevity” paradigm. The second pathway is through relief from abiotic constraints in productive environments. Despite notable exceptions, long-lived gymnosperms tend to follow the first path through slow growth in cold environments, whereas long-lived angiosperms tend to follow the second (“productivity”) path reaching maximum longevity generally in humid environments. For angiosperms, we identify two mechanisms for increased longevity under humid conditions. First, higher water availability increases species’ maximum tree height which is associated with greater longevities. Secondly, greater water availability increases stand density and inter-tree competition, limiting growth which may increase tree lifespan. The documented differences between gymnosperm and angiosperm longevity are likely rooted in intrinsic differences in hydraulic architecture that provide fitness advantages for gymnosperms under high abiotic stress, and for angiosperms under increased productivity or competition.

Original languageEnglish
Article number898
JournalNature Communications
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2026
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contrasting pathways to tree longevity in gymnosperms and angiosperms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this