Controversy grows over redefinition of gestational diabetes

Mark McLean; Len D. Moaven; Naswrin Moin; Jennifer A. Bradford

doi:10.5694/mja12.11326

Controversy grows over redefinition of gestational diabetes

Mark McLean, Len D. Moaven, Naswrin Moin, Jennifer A. Bradford

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Moynihan has recently suggested that gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a “nonentity” and cited controversy regarding new diagnostic criteria, while McIntyre and Oats have defended the practice of screening for GDM. Robust data associate hyperglycaemia with adverse pregnancy outcomes; and randomised controlled trial data show a beneficial effect of screening and treatment on perinatal outcomes.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	596-597
Number of pages	2
Journal	Medical Journal of Australia
Volume	198
Issue number	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5694/mja12.11326
Publication status	Published - 2013

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.5694/mja12.11326

Cite this

@article{2ccc4b8eba074eac9eb4cd88230d1bf1,

title = "Controversy grows over redefinition of gestational diabetes",

abstract = "Moynihan has recently suggested that gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a “nonentity” and cited controversy regarding new diagnostic criteria, while McIntyre and Oats have defended the practice of screening for GDM. Robust data associate hyperglycaemia with adverse pregnancy outcomes; and randomised controlled trial data show a beneficial effect of screening and treatment on perinatal outcomes.",

author = "Mark McLean and Moaven, {Len D.} and Naswrin Moin and Bradford, {Jennifer A.}",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.5694/mja12.11326",

language = "English",

volume = "198",

pages = "596--597",

journal = "Medical Journal of Australia",

issn = "0025-729X",

publisher = "Australasian Medical Publishing Company",

number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Controversy grows over redefinition of gestational diabetes

AU - McLean, Mark

AU - Moaven, Len D.

AU - Moin, Naswrin

AU - Bradford, Jennifer A.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Moynihan has recently suggested that gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a “nonentity” and cited controversy regarding new diagnostic criteria, while McIntyre and Oats have defended the practice of screening for GDM. Robust data associate hyperglycaemia with adverse pregnancy outcomes; and randomised controlled trial data show a beneficial effect of screening and treatment on perinatal outcomes.

AB - Moynihan has recently suggested that gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a “nonentity” and cited controversy regarding new diagnostic criteria, while McIntyre and Oats have defended the practice of screening for GDM. Robust data associate hyperglycaemia with adverse pregnancy outcomes; and randomised controlled trial data show a beneficial effect of screening and treatment on perinatal outcomes.

UR - http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/530077

U2 - 10.5694/mja12.11326

DO - 10.5694/mja12.11326

M3 - Article

SN - 0025-729X

VL - 198

SP - 596

EP - 597

JO - Medical Journal of Australia

JF - Medical Journal of Australia

IS - 11

ER -

Controversy grows over redefinition of gestational diabetes

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this