Core ADHD symptom improvement with atomoxetine versus methylphenidate: A direct comparison meta-analysis

Philip L. Hazell, Michael R. Kohn, Ruth Dickson, Richard J. Walton, Renee E. Granger, Gregory W. van Wyk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Previous studies comparing atomoxetine and methylphenidate to treat ADHD symptoms have been equivocal. This noninferiority meta-analysis compared core ADHD symptom response between atomoxetine and methylphenidate in children and adolescents. Method: Selection criteria included randomized, controlled design; duration 6 weeks; and assessment of ADHD Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator Administered and Scored (ADHDRS) scores. Six-week response rates, defined as ≥40% reduction in ADHDRS total score, were compared using a noninferiority margin of -15%. Results: Seven studies met inclusion criteria (N = 1,368). After 6 weeks, 53.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48.6%-58.4%) of atomoxetine-treated patients (n = 811) had responded compared with 54.4% (47.6%-61.1%) for methylphenidate (n = 557), with atomoxetine demonstrating noninferiority to methylphenidate (absolute difference -0.9%, 95% CI -9.2%-7.5%). Conclusion: After 6 weeks of treatment atomoxetine and methylphenidate had comparable efficacy in reducing core ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)674-683
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Attention Disorders
Volume15
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ADHD
  • atomoxetine
  • child
  • meta-analysis
  • methylphenidate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Core ADHD symptom improvement with atomoxetine versus methylphenidate: A direct comparison meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this