Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Could "Lehman Sisters" reduce bank risk-taking? : international evidence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research question/issue: Since the global financial crisis triggered by the collapse of Lehman Brothers, board gender diversity has attracted growing attention among academia and policy makers. The "Lehman Sisters" hypothesis argues for more female representation on bank director boards based on the stereotyped gender gap in risk preference, which has been widely supported by empirical studies on nonfinancial firms. However, due to the constraint of data unavailability, empirical research on board gender diversity and bank risk-taking is relatively scarce and mostly confined to individual developed markets with inconclusive findings. In this paper, we examine the impact of board gender diversity on bank risk-taking using a large hand-collected dataset covering 480 commercial banks across 18 developed and 21 developing countries over the period 2007-2016. Research findings/insights: We find that lower bank risk-taking is associated with greater board gender diversity, supporting the "Lehman Sisters" hypothesis in the international context; however, this effect is significantly weakened in countries with more hostile perception toward working women. We also confirm the critical threshold of three female directors to play a significant role in reducing bank risk-taking, providing novel international evidence in support of the critical mass theory from the banking sector. Theoretical/academic implications: Our findings help to reconcile existing contradictory empirical evidence from different countries by highlighting the importance of cultural effects. Practitioner/policy implications: We provide the first international empirical evidence in support of the policies aimed to promote representation of women on director boards, particularly in the banking sector. We confirm that a critical mass number of female directors on a bank board is important to avoid the tokenism problem. In countries with less support toward working women, policy makers also need to work on improving the overall working environment for women in order to achieve the expected outcome.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)297-321
Number of pages25
JournalCorporate Governance (Oxford)
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Corporate Governance: An International Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Open Access - Access Right Statement

© 2023 The Authors. Corporate Governance: An International Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 1 - No Poverty
    SDG 1 No Poverty
  2. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality
  3. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • critical mass theory
  • board gender diversity
  • corporate governance
  • bank risk-taking
  • Lehman Sisters hypothesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Could "Lehman Sisters" reduce bank risk-taking? : international evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this