Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Could soil microplastic pollution exacerbate climate change? A meta-analysis of greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential

  • Shahid Iqbal
  • , Jianchu Xu
  • , Muhammad Saleem Arif
  • , Awais Shakoor
  • , Fiona R. Worthy
  • , Heng Gui
  • , Sehroon Khan
  • , Dengpan Bu
  • , Sadia Nader
  • , Sailesh Ranjitkar
  • CAS - Kunming Institute of Botany
  • World Agroforestry Centre
  • Government College University Faisalabad
  • University of Science and Technology Bannu
  • Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
  • N. Gene Solution of Natural Innovation
  • Lumbini Buddhist University
  • Mid-West University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Microplastics pollution and climate change are primarily investigated in isolation, despite their joint threat to the environment. Greenhouse gases (GHGs) are emitted during: the production of plastic and rubber, the use and degradation of plastic, and after contamination of environment. This is the first meta-analysis to assess underlying causal relationships and the influence of likely mediators. We included 60 peer-reviewed empirical studies; estimating GHGs emissions effect size and global warming potential (GWP), according to key microplastics properties and soil conditions. We investigated interrelationships with microbe functional gene expression. Overall, microplastics contamination was associated with increased GHGs emissions, with the strongest effect (60%) on CH4 emissions. Polylactic-acid caused 32% higher CO2 emissions, but only 1% of total GWP. Phenol-formaldehyde had the greatest (175%) GWP via 182% increased N2O emissions. Only polystyrene resulted in reduced GWP by 50%, due to N2O mitigation. Polyethylene caused the maximum (60%) CH4 emissions. Shapes of microplastics differed in GWP: fiber had the greatest GWP (66%) whereas beads reduced GWP by 53%. Films substantially increased emissions of all GHGs: 14% CO2, 10% N2O and 60% CH4. Larger-sized microplastics had higher GWP (125%) due to their 9% CO2 and 63% N2O emissions. GWP rose sharply if soil microplastics content exceeded 0.5%. Higher CO2 emissions, ranging from 4% to 20%, arose from soil which was either fine, saturated or had high-carbon content. Higher N2O emissions, ranging from 10% to 95%, arose from soils that had either medium texture, saturated water content or low-carbon content. Both CO2 and N2O emissions were 43%-56% higher from soils with neutral pH. We conclude that microplastics contamination can cause raised GHGs emissions, posing a risk of exacerbating climate-change. We show clear links between GHGs emissions, microplastics properties, soil characteristics and soil microbe functional gene expression. Further research is needed regarding underlying mechanisms and processes. There is a Correction to the Original Article - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.119031
Original languageEnglish
Article number118945
Number of pages14
JournalEnvironmental Research
Volume252
Issue numberPart 2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Inc.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • Carbon dioxide
  • Climate warming
  • Methane
  • Nitrous oxide
  • Plastic residues
  • Soil pollution

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Could soil microplastic pollution exacerbate climate change? A meta-analysis of greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this