Abstract
This essay considers the post-COVID-19 debates over the level of migration to Australia to understand how the rhetoric of 'affective congestion' which is used for population management has changed. On the one hand, it demonstrates that the concerns of white bodies regarding congestion are taken more seriously by the political and media mainstream than those of new migrants. On the other, it shows that COVID-19 is bringing the injustice of this approach to light, as seen in the case of the harsh lockdown imposed on public housing estates in Melbourne. Finally, it argues for population density planning that uses the 'mobility justice' framework and makes a case for developing affective capacities in addition to building infrastructure.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 306-318 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Cultural Studies |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 2-3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'COVID-19 and the affective politics of congestion : an exploration of population density debates in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver