Cries from Babylon : the problem of compassion in Australian refugee policy

Jonathan Foye, Paul Ryder

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In considering the problem of asylum generally, and the experience of ‘boatpeople’ specifically, through the tools of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and New Criticism Cries from Babylon is a study of asylum-seeker discourse within the Australian body politic. More particularly, it is a retrospective on shifting policy rhetoric during the Rudd and Gillard Labor governments. Through its historical-cultural and linguistic analysis, the paper positions the rhetoric of these Prime Ministers in the context of an historical narrative concerning the asylum seeker. A principal finding is that, despite indubitably strong personal convictions (inspired, in significant measure, by the life and work of World War II martyr Deitrich Boenhoeffer), in trying to appease the right of Labor’s own broader electorate, Rudd occasionally echoed — though never adopted wholesale — the hard-line rhetoric of his predecessor John Howard, Prime Minister of Australia 1996 – 2007. In making its arguments, Cries from Babylon also considers the resurgence of such rhetoric by Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages12
    JournalGlobal Media Journal: Australian Edition
    Volume5
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cries from Babylon : the problem of compassion in Australian refugee policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this