Deal or no deal, that is the question : the impact of increasing stakes and framing effects on decision-making under risk

Robert Brooks, Robert Faff, Daniel Mulino, Richard Scheelings

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In this paper, we utilize data from the Australian version of the TV game show, ‘Deal or No Deal’, to explore risk aversion in a high real stakes setting. An attractive feature of this version of the game is that supplementary rounds may occur which switch the decision frame of players. There are four main findings. First, we observe that the degree of risk aversion generally increases with stakes. Second, we observe considerable heterogeneity in people's willingness to bear risk – even at very high stakes. Third, we find that age and gender are statistically significant determinants of risk aversion, while wealth is not. Fourth, we find that the reversal of framing does have a significant impact on people's willingness to bear risk.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)27-50
    Number of pages24
    JournalInternational Review of Finance
    Volume9
    Issue number45323
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Keywords

    • finance
    • securities
    • decision making
    • financial risk

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Deal or no deal, that is the question : the impact of increasing stakes and framing effects on decision-making under risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this