Debating the categories of remote indigenous sociality

Tim Rowse

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In The Use of Official Statistics in Sociology (1973), Barry Hindess distinguished between two critical approaches to official statistics: technical and theoretical. In this article I will elucidate Barry’s distinction and then apply it to a recent body of research by social scientists at the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Research. In Making Sense of the Census (2002) and Agency, Contingency and the Census Process (2007), the CAEPR authors give a critical account of the enumeration of remote-living Indigenous Australians. I will offer a reading of these two publications that is faithful to Barry’s distinction between “technical” and “theoretical” critique.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)39-47
    Number of pages8
    JournalAlternatives : Global\, Local\, Political
    Volume36
    Issue number1 (Feb. 2011)
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Keywords

    • census
    • economic development
    • family
    • indigenous
    • population

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Debating the categories of remote indigenous sociality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this