TY - JOUR
T1 - Defending Antipodean economic geography
AU - Wray, Felicity
AU - Dufty-Jones, Rae
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - In response to the commentaries, we reflect on the pitfalls and opportunities that come with identifying and naming ‘Antipodean economic geographies’ and in particular emphasise the practical aspects of this decision. We also critically reflect on suggestions that we have brought such knowledges into a set of market relations, citing how the recently published International Benchmarking Review of UK Human Geography gives added salience to the intentions of our original paper. Finally, we note the useful ground clearing that these commentaries make for future debates around the politics and whereness of economic geographical knowledge production in new global contexts.
AB - In response to the commentaries, we reflect on the pitfalls and opportunities that come with identifying and naming ‘Antipodean economic geographies’ and in particular emphasise the practical aspects of this decision. We also critically reflect on suggestions that we have brought such knowledges into a set of market relations, citing how the recently published International Benchmarking Review of UK Human Geography gives added salience to the intentions of our original paper. Finally, we note the useful ground clearing that these commentaries make for future debates around the politics and whereness of economic geographical knowledge production in new global contexts.
UR - http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/538906
U2 - 10.1177/2043820613493157
DO - 10.1177/2043820613493157
M3 - Article
SN - 2043-8214
SN - 2043-8206
VL - 3
SP - 222
EP - 225
JO - Dialogues in Human Geography
JF - Dialogues in Human Geography
IS - 2
ER -