TY - JOUR
T1 - Deferred cord clamping, cord milking, and immediate cord clamping at preterm birth
T2 - a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
AU - Seidler, Anna Lene
AU - Aberoumand, Mason
AU - Hunter, Kylie E.
AU - Barba, Angie
AU - Libesman, Sol
AU - Williams, Jonathan G.
AU - Shrestha, Nipun
AU - Aagerup, Jannik
AU - Sotiropoulos, James X.
AU - Montgomery, Alan A.
AU - Gyte, Gillian M.L.
AU - Duley, Lelia
AU - Askie, Lisa M.
AU - iCOMP Collaborators
AU - Garg, Aashim
AU - Kumar, Aditi
AU - Tan, Aidan C.
AU - Kugelman, Amir
AU - Webster, Angela C.
AU - George, Anu A.
AU - Thukral, Anu
AU - Katheria, Anup C.
AU - te Pas, Arjan B.
AU - KC, Ashish
AU - Urlesberger, Berndt
AU - Schwaberger, Bernhard
AU - Backes, Carl H.
AU - De Paco Matallana, Catalina
AU - Tanprasertkul, Chamnan
AU - Ruangkit, Chayatat
AU - Chawla, Deepak
AU - Blank, Douglas A.
AU - Okulu, Emel
AU - Dempsey, Eugene M.
AU - Ram Mohan, Govindu
AU - Polglase, Graeme R.
AU - Carroli, Guillermo
AU - Al-Wassia, Heidi K.
AU - Rabe, Heike
AU - Liley, Helen G.
AU - Atia, Hytham
AU - Nour, Islam
AU - Liu, Jiang Qin
AU - Kattwinkel, John
AU - Dorling, Jon S.
AU - Mercer, Judith S.
AU - Josephsen, Justin B.
AU - Fairchild, Karen D.
AU - Wallace, Kedra
AU - Murphy, Kellie E.
AU - Robledo, Kristy P.
PY - 2023/12/9
Y1 - 2023/12/9
N2 - Background: Umbilical cord clamping strategies at preterm birth have the potential to affect important health outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of deferred cord clamping, umbilical cord milking, and immediate cord clamping in reducing neonatal mortality and morbidity at preterm birth. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. We searched medical databases and trial registries (from database inception until Feb 24, 2022; updated June 6, 2023) for randomised controlled trials comparing deferred (also known as delayed) cord clamping, cord milking, and immediate cord clamping for preterm births (<37 weeks' gestation). Quasi-randomised or cluster-randomised trials were excluded. Authors of eligible studies were invited to join the iCOMP collaboration and share individual participant data. All data were checked, harmonised, re-coded, and assessed for risk of bias following prespecified criteria. The primary outcome was death before hospital discharge. We performed intention-to-treat one-stage individual participant data meta-analyses accounting for heterogeneity to examine treatment effects overall and in prespecified subgroup analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019136640. Findings: We identified 2369 records, of which 48 randomised trials provided individual participant data and were eligible for our primary analysis. We included individual participant data on 6367 infants (3303 [55%] male, 2667 [45%] female, two intersex, and 395 missing data). Deferred cord clamping, compared with immediate cord clamping, reduced death before discharge (odds ratio [OR] 0·68 [95% CI 0·51–0·91], high-certainty evidence, 20 studies, n=3260, 232 deaths). For umbilical cord milking compared with immediate cord clamping, no clear evidence was found of a difference in death before discharge (OR 0·73 [0·44–1·20], low certainty, 18 studies, n=1561, 74 deaths). Similarly, for umbilical cord milking compared with deferred cord clamping, no clear evidence was found of a difference in death before discharge (0·95 [0·59–1·53], low certainty, 12 studies, n=1303, 93 deaths). We found no evidence of subgroup differences for the primary outcome, including by gestational age, type of delivery, multiple birth, study year, and perinatal mortality. Interpretation: This study provides high-certainty evidence that deferred cord clamping, compared with immediate cord clamping, reduces death before discharge in preterm infants. This effect appears to be consistent across several participant-level and trial-level subgroups. These results will inform international treatment recommendations. Funding: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.
AB - Background: Umbilical cord clamping strategies at preterm birth have the potential to affect important health outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of deferred cord clamping, umbilical cord milking, and immediate cord clamping in reducing neonatal mortality and morbidity at preterm birth. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. We searched medical databases and trial registries (from database inception until Feb 24, 2022; updated June 6, 2023) for randomised controlled trials comparing deferred (also known as delayed) cord clamping, cord milking, and immediate cord clamping for preterm births (<37 weeks' gestation). Quasi-randomised or cluster-randomised trials were excluded. Authors of eligible studies were invited to join the iCOMP collaboration and share individual participant data. All data were checked, harmonised, re-coded, and assessed for risk of bias following prespecified criteria. The primary outcome was death before hospital discharge. We performed intention-to-treat one-stage individual participant data meta-analyses accounting for heterogeneity to examine treatment effects overall and in prespecified subgroup analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019136640. Findings: We identified 2369 records, of which 48 randomised trials provided individual participant data and were eligible for our primary analysis. We included individual participant data on 6367 infants (3303 [55%] male, 2667 [45%] female, two intersex, and 395 missing data). Deferred cord clamping, compared with immediate cord clamping, reduced death before discharge (odds ratio [OR] 0·68 [95% CI 0·51–0·91], high-certainty evidence, 20 studies, n=3260, 232 deaths). For umbilical cord milking compared with immediate cord clamping, no clear evidence was found of a difference in death before discharge (OR 0·73 [0·44–1·20], low certainty, 18 studies, n=1561, 74 deaths). Similarly, for umbilical cord milking compared with deferred cord clamping, no clear evidence was found of a difference in death before discharge (0·95 [0·59–1·53], low certainty, 12 studies, n=1303, 93 deaths). We found no evidence of subgroup differences for the primary outcome, including by gestational age, type of delivery, multiple birth, study year, and perinatal mortality. Interpretation: This study provides high-certainty evidence that deferred cord clamping, compared with immediate cord clamping, reduces death before discharge in preterm infants. This effect appears to be consistent across several participant-level and trial-level subgroups. These results will inform international treatment recommendations. Funding: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85176959671&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://ezproxy.uws.edu.au/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02468-6
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02468-6
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02468-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 37977169
AN - SCOPUS:85176959671
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 402
SP - 2209
EP - 2222
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 10418
ER -