Demonising the dingo : how much wild dogma is enough?

Mike Letnic, Mathew S. Crowther, Christopher R. Dickman, Euan G. Ritchie

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    26 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The roles that top predators play in regulating the structure and function of ecosystems have long been controversial. This is particularly the case when predators pose adverse risks for human life and/or economic interests. The critique of literature on dingoes and their ecological roles in Australia provided by Allen et al. (2011) shows that top predators remain a potentially polarising issue. In opposition to Allen et al. we argue that these widespread patterns of species' abundances, attributed to the effects of dingoes and evident at scales ranging from the foraging behaviour of individuals through to continental scale patterns of species abundances, constitute strong support for the mesopredator release hypothesis and provide evidence that dingoes benefit biodiversity conservation by inducing community wide trophic cascades. Harnessing the positive ecological effects of dingoes while at the same time minimising their impacts on agriculture is a major socio-political challenge in Australia.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)668-670
    Number of pages3
    JournalCurrent Zoology
    Volume57
    Issue number5
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Demonising the dingo : how much wild dogma is enough?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this