Abstract
This final response to the two climate change denial papers by Shani and Arad further highlights the inaccuracies, misinformation and errors in their commentaries. The obfuscation of scientific research and the consensus on anthropogenic climate change may have significant long-term negative consequences for better understanding the implications of climate change and climate policy for tourism and create confusion and delay in developing and implementing tourism sector responses.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 352-356 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Tourism Management |
| Volume | 47 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- climate changes
- research
- skepticism
- tourism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Denying bogus skepticism in climate change and tourism research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver