Derogating from international human rights obligations in the ‘War Against Terrorism'? a British–Australian perspective

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This article examines the United Kingdom’s Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 and the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2002 (Cth) from an international human rights law perspective. It argues that both pieces of legislation raise serious concerns in relation to international legal obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Both international treaties allow for ‘derogation from certain provisions in times of ‘public emergency’. While the United Kingdom has officially derogated from some of its treaty obligations, Australia has yet to submit a similar notification. This article argues, however, that the United Kingdom’s derogation is unlawful. Likewise, current circumstances in Australia would not permit lawful derogation from the ICCPR.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTerrorism and Human Rights
EditorsMagnus Ranstorp, Paul Wilkinson
Place of PublicationU.S.
PublisherRouledge
Chapter9
Pages201-225
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)9781315878584
ISBN (Print)9780415414791
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Derogating from international human rights obligations in the ‘War Against Terrorism'? a British–Australian perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this