Design flood estimation in ungauged catchments : quantile regression technique and probabilistic rational method compared

Nirab Rijal, Ataur Rahman, Andre Zeger, Robert M. Argent

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperConference Paper

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Estimation of design floods in ungauged catchments is frequently required in hydrological practice and is of great economic significance. The most commonly adopted methods for this task include the Probabilistic Rational Method, the U.S. Soil Conservation Service Method, the Index Flood Method and the U. S. Geological Survey Quantile Regression Technique. The Probabilistic Rational Method has been recommended in the Australian Rainfall and Runoff for general use in south-east Australia (I. E. Aust., 1997). The central component of this technique is a dimensionless runoff coefficient which in the ARR is assumed to vary smoothly over geographical space, an assumption that may not be satisfied in many cases because two nearby catchments though are likely to share similar climatic characteristics but may exhibit quite different physical characteristics.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationMODSIM05: International Congress on Modelling and Simulation: Advances and Applications for Management and Decision Making, Melbourne, 12-15 December
    PublisherModelling & Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand
    Number of pages7
    ISBN (Print)0975840002
    Publication statusPublished - 2005
    EventInternational Congress on Modelling and Simulation -
    Duration: 12 Dec 2011 → …

    Conference

    ConferenceInternational Congress on Modelling and Simulation
    Period12/12/11 → …

    Keywords

    • Australia
    • flood forecasting
    • probabilistic rational method
    • quantile regression technique
    • runoff
    • watersheds

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Design flood estimation in ungauged catchments : quantile regression technique and probabilistic rational method compared'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this