Designing jobs : universal principles or strategic choice?

Dennis Mortimer, Christine O'Connor

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The latter half of the twentieth century and the beginning of the twenty-first century have seen significant interest in redesigning jobs to stimulate employee motivation and job satisfaction. It has been argued that employees will perform better if they can utilise a variety of skills in performing tasks which have meaning and significance for both the employees and for those who consume the end product, and where the employees have considerable autonomy in carrying out these tasks. This paper examines the literature on job redesign and considers the question as to whether these principles should apply in all cases, or whether other factors such as business strategy and managerial choice should be considered in determining the applicability of job redesign principles.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)48-67
    Number of pages20
    JournalInternational Employment Relations Review
    Volume20
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • work design
    • job satisfaction
    • employee motivation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Designing jobs : universal principles or strategic choice?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this