Detecting phonetic variation versus phonemic differences

Daniel Williams, Paola Escudero

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperConference Paperpeer-review

Abstract

Second-language (L2) speech perception research has largely focused on learning to detect phonetic variation which contributes to phonemic differences. However, phonetic variation may emerge for other reasons, e.g., different speakers. In native language acquisition, speech perception is flexible enough to permit speaker-related phonetic variation while at the same time preserving phonemic identity. In L2 speech learning, it remains unclear how speakerrelated phonetic variation is learned or processed. To test how monolinguals and L2 learners handle speaker-related phonetic variation in detecting phonemic differences, the present study investigated the discrimination of novel words spoken in a familiar and unfamiliar accent. Compared to monolinguals, near-native L2 learners made slightly more errors overall and were quicker to attribute large phonetic differences to phonemic differences rather than speaker-related differences. This highlights the challenging task of learning naturally permissible variation in L2 phonemic categories.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2019), 5-9 August 2019, Melbourne, Australia
PublisherAustralasian Speech Science and Technology
Pages265-269
Number of pages5
ISBN (Print)9780646800691
Publication statusPublished - 2019
EventInternational Congress of Phonetic Sciences -
Duration: 5 Aug 2019 → …

Conference

ConferenceInternational Congress of Phonetic Sciences
Period5/08/19 → …

Keywords

  • English language
  • phonetics
  • dialects
  • second language acquisition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Detecting phonetic variation versus phonemic differences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this