Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Determinants of birth satisfaction in Australian public maternity care: a cross-sectional survey using the birth satisfaction scale-revised (BSS-R)

  • B. Gidaszewski
  • , E. Jefford
  • , M. Khajehei
  • , J. Marsden
  • , R. Woodworth
  • , D. Fox
  • , D. Pasupathy
  • , K. Baird
  • , J. Jomeen
  • , A. Briley
  • Westmead Hospital
  • The University of Sydney
  • University of the Sunshine Coast
  • University of New South Wales
  • University of Technology Sydney
  • Southern Cross University
  • Flinders University
  • Southern Adelaide Local Health Network

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Birth satisfaction is an important indicator of maternity care quality and is associated with emotional wellbeing, care engagement, and future health-seeking behaviour. Although models of maternity care influence outcomes and experiences, most Australian studies using the Birth Satisfaction Scale–Revised (BSS-R) have focused on continuity-based or student-led cohorts, limiting generalisability to routine public services. Aim: To examine birth satisfaction among women receiving standard public maternity care in Australia and identify demographic, clinical, and psychosocial predictors. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 396 women was conducted across three public hospitals in New South Wales, Queensland, and South Australia between 2022 and 2023. Birth satisfaction was measured using the UK version of the BSS-R and categorised as low (<20), moderate (20–25), or high (≥26). Differences across antenatal care models (hospital-based midwifery care, GP shared care, and public obstetric care) were examined using Kruskal–Wallis tests. Multinomial logistic regression identified independent predictors of satisfaction. Free-text responses were reviewed descriptively to provide contextual insight. Results: The mean BSS-R score was 23.2 (SD 5.17), lower than scores reported in previous Australian studies involving continuity-based models. Satisfaction did not differ significantly across models of care. Independent predictors of low versus high satisfaction included higher EPDS scores (per-point OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07–1.22), emergency caesarean (OR 4.8) or elective caesarean birth (OR 2.6), ongoing maternal complications (OR 3.8), parity of one prior birth (OR 3.4), and absence of a birth companion. Free-text responses highlighted the importance of respectful, emotionally supportive care and feeling listened to were, even within fragmented care pathways. Conclusion: This study provides new reference data on birth satisfaction among women receiving routine public maternity care in Australia. Satisfaction appeared more strongly associated with clinical events, psychosocial wellbeing, and relational aspects of care than with model-of-care labels alone, while free-text responses highlighted the importance of respectful and emotionally supportive care. Strengthening respectful, emotionally attuned care across maternity services may improve women's birth experiences.

Original languageEnglish
Article number104871
Number of pages10
JournalMidwifery
Volume160
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Birth satisfaction
  • Birth satisfaction scale - revised (bss-r)
  • Maternity care
  • Models of care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Determinants of birth satisfaction in Australian public maternity care: a cross-sectional survey using the birth satisfaction scale-revised (BSS-R)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this