Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Development and evaluation of the high-intensity interval training self-efficacy questionnaire

  • Narelle Eather
  • , Mark R. Beauchamp
  • , Ryan E. Rhodes
  • , Thierno M. O. Diallo
  • , Jordan J. Smith
  • , Mary E. Jung
  • , Ronald C. Plotnikoff
  • , Michael Noetel
  • , Nigel Harris
  • , Emily Graham
  • , David R. Lubans

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study involved the design and evaluation of the High-Intensity Interval Training Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (HIIT-SQ). Phase 1: Questionnaire items were developed. Phase 2: Australian adolescents (N = 389, 16.0 ± 0.4 years, 41.10% female) completed the HIIT-SQ, and factorial validity of the measurement model was explored. Phase 3: Adolescents (N = 100, age 12–14 years, 44% female) completed the HIIT-SQ twice (1 week apart) to evaluate test–retest reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis of the final six items (mean = 3.43–6.73, SD = 0.99–25.30) revealed adequate fit, χ2(21) = 21, p = .01, comparative fit index = .99, Tucker–Lewis index = .99, root mean square of approximation = .07, 90% confidence interval [.04, .11]. Factor loading estimates showed that all items were highly related to the factor (estimates range: 0.81–0.90). Intraclass coefficients and typical error values were .99 (95% confidence interval [.99, 1.00]) and .22, respectively. This study provides preliminary evidence for the validity and reliability of scores derived from the HIIT-SQ in adolescents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)114-122
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Human Kinetics, Inc.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development and evaluation of the high-intensity interval training self-efficacy questionnaire'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this