Development of a checklist of standard items for processing individual participant data from randomised trials for meta-analyses : protocol for a modified e-Delphi study

K. E. Hunter, A. C. Webster, M. Clarke, M. J. Page, S. Libesman, P. J. Godolphin, M. Aberoumand, L. H. M. Rydzewska, R. Wang, Aidan C. Tan, W. Li, B. W. Mol, M. Willson, V. Brown, T. Palacios, A. L. Seidler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Individual participant data meta-analyses enable detailed checking of data quality and more complex analyses than standard study-level synthesis of summary data based on publications. However, there is limited existing guidance on the specific systematic checks that should be undertaken to confirm and enhance data quality for individual participant data meta-analyses and how to conduct these checks. We aim to address this gap by developing a checklist of items for data quality checking and cleaning to be applied to individual participant data meta-analyses of randomised trials. This study will comprise three phases: 1) a scoping review to identify potential checklist items; 2) two e-Delphi survey rounds among an invited panel of experts followed by a consensus meeting; and 3) pilot testing and refinement of the checklist, including development of an accompanying R-markdown program to facilitate its uptake.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0275893
Number of pages10
JournalPLoS One
Volume17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Open Access - Access Right Statement

© 2022 Hunter et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of a checklist of standard items for processing individual participant data from randomised trials for meta-analyses : protocol for a modified e-Delphi study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this