Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Development of a core outcome set for studies assessing interventions for diabetes-related foot ulceration

  • Aleksandra Staniszewska
  • , Frances Game
  • , Jane Nixon
  • , David Russell
  • , David G. Armstrong
  • , Christopher Ashmore
  • , Sicco A. Bus
  • , Jayer Chung
  • , Vivienne Chuter
  • , Ketan Dhatariya
  • , George Dovell
  • , Michael Edmonds
  • , Robert Fitridge
  • , Catherine Gooday
  • , Emma J. Hamilton
  • , Amy Jones
  • , Venu Kavarthapu
  • , Lawrence A. Lavery
  • , Joseph L. Mills
  • , Matilde Monteiro-Soares
  • Maia Osborne-Grinter, Edgar J.G. Peters, Joseph Shalhoub, Jaap van Netten, Dane K. Wukich, Robert J. Hinchliffe
  • University of Bristol
  • North Bristol NHS Trust
  • University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Leeds
  • University of Southern California
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of East Anglia
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Adelaide
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital
  • University of Western Australia
  • Fiona Stanley Hospital
  • King's College London
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • Portuguese Red Cross Health School Lisbon
  • Cross Investigação e Desenvolvimento
  • University of Porto
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Diabetes affects 537 million people globally, with 34% expected to develop foot ulceration in their lifetime. Diabetes-related foot ulceration causes strain on health care systems worldwide, necessitating provision of high-quality evidence to guide their management. Given heterogeneity of reported outcomes, a core outcome set (COS) was developed to standardize outcome measures in studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The COS was developed using Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) methodology. A systematic review and patient interviews generated a long list of outcomes that were rated by patients and experts using a nine-point Likert scale (from 1 [not important] to 9 [critical]) in the first round of the Delphi survey. Based on predefined criteria, outcomes without consensus were repriori-tized in a second Delphi round. Critical outcomes and those without consensus after two Delphi rounds were discussed in the consensus meeting where the COS was ratified. RESULTS The systematic review and patient interviews generated 103 candidate outcomes. The two consecutive Delphi rounds were completed by 336 and 176 respondents, resulting in an overall second round response rate of 52%. Of 37 outcomes discussed in the consensus meeting (22 critical and 15 without consensus after the second round), 8 formed the COS: wound healing, time to healing, new/recurrent ulceration, infection, major amputation, minor amputation, health-related quality of life, and mortality. CONCLUSIONS The proposed COS for studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration was developed using COMET methodology. Its adoption by the research community will facilitate assessment of comparative effectiveness of current and evolving interventions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1958-1968
Number of pages11
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume47
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the American Diabetes Association.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of a core outcome set for studies assessing interventions for diabetes-related foot ulceration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this