Abstract
There is a societal expectation that undergraduate degrees will contain activities that focus on making graduates workplace ready. Although it is likely that many of these activities occur in science degrees, there is a lack of formal and tested methodologies and frameworks for identifying them. One existing framework (Edwards, Perkins, Pearce, & Hong, 2015) was used to analyze WIL activities identified in course (unit, n=81) documentation and interviews with unit coordinators (n=71) at one Australian University. This revealed many (hidden) WIL activities that had not been previously articulated to either students or curriculum designers. The authors refined the existing framework to develop a rubric that allows the depth and breadth of WIL activities to be captured in a standard manner and WIL activities in a degree to be readily mapped.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 351-364 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- curriculum planning
- education, higher
- employability
- science
- university students
- work integrated learning
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Development of a rubric for identifying and characterizing work : integrated learning activities in science undergraduate courses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver