Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Diabetes care by general practitioners in South Auckland: Changes from 1990 to 1999

  • Tim Kenealy
  • , Helen Kenealy
  • , Bruce Arroll
  • , David Scott
  • , Robert Scragg
  • , David Simmons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To compare self-reported practices and preferences for diabetes care by general practitioners (GPs) in South Auckland between 1990 and 1999. Methods: Mail questionnaires were sent to all GPs in South Auckland in 1990, and again in 1999. Results: The response rate was 88% (163/185) in 1990 and 76% (186/245) in 1999 (p = 0.3). In 1999, compared with 1990, GPs had more diabetic patients (median 33 vs 20, p <0.001), more GPs screened for diabetes using a fasting laboratory glucose (33.6% vs 22.9%, p = 0.04), more screened with capillary whole-blood testing meters (19.5% vs 1.3%, p <0.001), more felt confident to detect complications (95.1% vs 84.3%, p 0.001) and probably more felt confident to initiate insulin in Type 2 diabetes. Women in both years, compared with male GPs, were more likely to refer newly diagnosed diabetic patients to secondary services (68.0% vs 42.8%, p <0.001) and more likely to prefer 'shared care' for ongoing care (74.7% vs 58.7%, p = 0.007). Conclusions: There have been large changes in GP diabetes care in South Auckland from 1990 to 1999. GPs in 1999 seem more confident to care for larger numbers of diabetes patients. Significant differences in practice style exist between male and female GPs.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe New Zealand medical journal
Volume115
Issue number1164
Publication statusPublished - 25 Oct 2002
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diabetes care by general practitioners in South Auckland: Changes from 1990 to 1999'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this