Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block

Thomas Nestelberger, Louise Cullen, Bertil Lindahl, Tobias Reichlin, Jaimi H. Greenslade, Evangelos Giannitsis, Michael Christ, Beata Morawiec, Oscar Miro, Francisco Javier Martin-Sanchez, Desiree Nadine Wussler, Luca Koechlin, Raphael Twerenbold, William Parsonage, Jasper Boeddinghaus, Maria Rubini Gimenez, Christian Puelacher, Karin Wildi, Tobias Buerge, Patrick BadertscherJeanne DuFaydeLavallaz, Ivo Strebel, Lukas Croton, Garnet Bendig, Stefan Osswald, John William Pickering, Martin Than, Christian Mueller, Petra Hillinger, Karin Grimm, Ursina Honegger, Nicolas Schaerli, Nikola Kozhuharov, Claudia Stelzig, Michael Freese, Zaid Sabti, Joan Walter, Lorraine Sazgary, Caroline Kulangara, Kathrin Meissner, Deborah Mueller, Beatriz Lopez, Emilio Salgado, Esther Rodríguez Adrada, Damian Kawecki, Jiri Parenica, Eva Ganovska, Katharina Rentsch, Andreas Buser, John French, et al.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective Patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the setting of left bundle branch block (LBBB) present an important diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to the clinician. Methods We prospectively evaluated the incidence of AMI and diagnostic performance of specific ECG and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) criteria in patients presenting with chest discomfort to 26 emergency departments in three international, prospective, diagnostic studies. The final diagnosis of AMI was centrally adjudicated by two independent cardiologists according to the universal definition of myocardial infarction. Results Among 8830 patients, LBBB was present in 247 (2.8%). AMI was the final diagnosis in 30% of patients with LBBB, with similar incidence in those with known LBBB versus those with presumably new LBBB (29% vs 35%, p=0.42). ECG criteria had low sensitivity (1%-12%) but high specificity (95%-100%) for AMI. The diagnostic accuracy as quantified by the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve of hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI concentrations at presentation (area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.96 and AUC 0.89, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.95), as well as that of their 0/1-hour and 0/2-hour changes, was very high. A diagnostic algorithm combining ECG criteria with hs-cTnT/I concentrations and their absolute changes at 1 hour or 2 hours derived in cohort 1 (45 of 45(100%) patients with AMI correctly identified) showed high efficacy and accuracy when externally validated in cohorts 2 and 3 (28 of 29 patients, 97%). Conclusion Most patients presenting with suspected AMI and LBBB will be found to have diagnoses other than AMI. Combining ECG criteria with hs-cTnT/I testing at 0/1 hour or 0/2 hours allows early and accurate diagnosis of AMI in LBBB. Trial registration number APACE: NCT00470587; ADAPT: ACTRN12611001069943; TRAPID-AMI: RD001107;Results.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1559-1567
Number of pages9
JournalHeart
Volume105
Issue number20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this