Diagnostic subtyping of obsessive-compulsive disorder : have we got it all wrong?

Vlasios Brakoulias

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The presenting complaint of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is often their predominant OCD symptom (e.g. excessive checking, hand-washing, or distressing intrusive thoughts). Yet OCD symptoms do not feature as OCD specifiers in any of the major diagnostic classificatory systems such as the ICD-10 (World Health Organization, 1992), DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 1994), or even in the proposed changes for DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association, 2012). Instead, the degree of insight and the presence of comorbid tics are preferred as specifiers, and hoarding is proposed to constitute a separate disorder in DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association, 2012). The mounting evidence supporting the role of predominant OCD symptoms in explaining the heterogeneity of OCD (Bloch et al., 2008; Mataix-Cols et al., 2005) may lead one to wonder why they are not featured in major diagnostic classificatory systems and whether we have got it all wrong.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-25
Number of pages3
JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • obsessive-compulsive disorder
  • therapeutics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic subtyping of obsessive-compulsive disorder : have we got it all wrong?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this