Direct versus indirect bonding for bracket placement in orthodontic patients

Wenya Huang, Fan Jian, Wenli Lai, Wen Li, Declan T. Millett, Grant T. McIntyre, Zhihe Zhao, Yan Wang, Zongdao Shi, Taixiang Wu, Guan J. Liu, Joy Hickman, Amit Arora

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Orthodontic treatment is primarily concerned with correcting crowded, rotated, buried and/or prominent front teeth. The epidemiology of the need for orthodontic treatment varies around the world. It has been determined that 17%of 8 to 11 year old children in the USA and 34% of 9 to 12 year old Brazilian school children have a "high need" for orthodontic treatment (Christopherson 2009; Dias 2009). Studies also indicate that, in the Middle East, 34% of children (12 to 14 years) and 29.2% of young adults (21 to 25 years) are categorised as having a "need" for orthodontic treatment (Alhaija 2004; Hassan 2010). In Europe, it is reported that 26.2% of German children in the mixed dentition stage and approximately 20% of Spanish children have a "need" for orthodontic treatment (Tausche 2004; Manzanera 2009). In the Far East, 35% of children in Thailand (11 to 12 years) were assessed as requiring orthodontic treatment (Gherunpong 2006). When exploring the influence of ethnic origin, one study noted that 39.5% of Swedish natives and 32.7% of Asian immigrants required orthodontic treatment (Josefsson 2007).
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages8
    JournalCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
    Volume7
    Issue numberCD009965
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Keywords

    • orthodontics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Direct versus indirect bonding for bracket placement in orthodontic patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this