Discredited fascism : the New Guard after 1932

Andrew Moore

doi:10.1111/j.1467-8497.2011.01591.x

Discredited fascism : the New Guard after 1932

Andrew Moore

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In large part Australian interwar fascism has been studied in isolation. The present article compares and contrasts the New Guard with kindred movements in Europe during the 1930s. Using the conceptual model of “generic fascism” developed by Roger Griffin, its principal concern is to explain why, in the “era of fascism”, with many factors encouraging the growth of authoritarian movements to replace parliamentary democracy, the New Guard proved to be so manifestly unsuccessful.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	188-206
Number of pages	19
Journal	Australian Journal of Politics and History
Volume	57
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8497.2011.01591.x
Publication status	Published - 2011

Keywords

Australia
Europe
New Guard (Organisation)
fascism

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1467-8497.2011.01591.x

Cite this

@article{c7f86b026eef4a8a854da412db05eae4,

title = "Discredited fascism : the New Guard after 1932",

abstract = "In large part Australian interwar fascism has been studied in isolation. The present article compares and contrasts the New Guard with kindred movements in Europe during the 1930s. Using the conceptual model of “generic fascism” developed by Roger Griffin, its principal concern is to explain why, in the “era of fascism”, with many factors encouraging the growth of authoritarian movements to replace parliamentary democracy, the New Guard proved to be so manifestly unsuccessful.",

keywords = "Australia, Europe, New Guard (Organisation), fascism",

author = "Andrew Moore",

year = "2011",

doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8497.2011.01591.x",

language = "English",

volume = "57",

pages = "188--206",

journal = "Australian Journal of Politics and History",

issn = "0004-9522",

publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discredited fascism : the New Guard after 1932

AU - Moore, Andrew

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - In large part Australian interwar fascism has been studied in isolation. The present article compares and contrasts the New Guard with kindred movements in Europe during the 1930s. Using the conceptual model of “generic fascism” developed by Roger Griffin, its principal concern is to explain why, in the “era of fascism”, with many factors encouraging the growth of authoritarian movements to replace parliamentary democracy, the New Guard proved to be so manifestly unsuccessful.

AB - In large part Australian interwar fascism has been studied in isolation. The present article compares and contrasts the New Guard with kindred movements in Europe during the 1930s. Using the conceptual model of “generic fascism” developed by Roger Griffin, its principal concern is to explain why, in the “era of fascism”, with many factors encouraging the growth of authoritarian movements to replace parliamentary democracy, the New Guard proved to be so manifestly unsuccessful.

KW - Australia

KW - Europe

KW - New Guard (Organisation)

KW - fascism

UR - http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/525640

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8497.2011.01591.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8497.2011.01591.x

M3 - Article

SN - 0004-9522

VL - 57

SP - 188

EP - 206

JO - Australian Journal of Politics and History

JF - Australian Journal of Politics and History

IS - 2

ER -

Discredited fascism : the New Guard after 1932

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this