Disentangling eating disorder diagnostic schemes : Commentary on Walsh et al., "A systematic review comparing atypical anorexia nervosa and anorexia nervosa"

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This commentary discusses the systematic review by Walsh et al. that has found that people with atypical anorexia nervosa have similar symptoms and severity as have people with anorexia nervosa. In this paper, the discussion is broadened to other eating disorders diagnoses and the problem of overlap and crossover between syndromes that impacts adversely on the need for diagnoses to be distinct both at assessment but also over time. It is argued that the derivation of eating disorder diagnostic criteria has also been vulnerable to erroneous assumptions and biased observations. Whether atypical anorexia nervosa becomes a standalone diagnosis or is joined with an expanded anorexia nervosa, future delineations should be based on empirical research including neuroscience.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)841-843
Number of pages3
JournalInternational Journal of Eating Disorders
Volume56
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2023

Open Access - Access Right Statement

© 2023 The Author. International Journal of Eating Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Keywords

  • bulimia nervosa
  • DSM-5
  • binge-eating disorder
  • diagnosis
  • anorexia nervosa
  • classification
  • atypical AN

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disentangling eating disorder diagnostic schemes : Commentary on Walsh et al., "A systematic review comparing atypical anorexia nervosa and anorexia nervosa"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this